This is my journal of weekly news and
events in the ongoing Paul Bergrin trial. It is a summary of how I
read the events and testimony and includes the news source. At the
end of the post you'll find my
assignment of points to the feds and to Paul Bergrin, and this week to Judge Martini as well. I have my own
personal point system and it is not scientific, but more interpretive
and from my perspective and will most often be based on belief or
disbelief of testimony. Points will accrue as the trial moves
forward. Any statement in brackets should be attributed to me.
Week
2 of the Paul Bergrin trial started off with a bang as the jury heard
from Paul's former girlfriend, Yolanda Jauregui, who is occasionally
referred to as “jezebel” herein. The Urban Dictionary defines
“jezebel” as “a girl who is incredibly manipulative and
fucks with dudes minds,” and that is also my definition and
viewpoint of Yolanda.
The week ended with a bang as the man referred
to as prosecutors' “key witness” testified and Paul exposed the
many discrepancies in his testimony. Judge Martini declared a recess
until Wednesday, November 2, 2011, probably to decide if he should
toss the entire case out.
Week
2 Trial Events and Testimony Recap
The mental
picture of a soft-spoken, meek Yolanda Jauregui testifying against
Paul doesn't match the description of her that I have heard in past,
but then she is the actress and the courtroom is her stage as she
works it to gain favor with prosecutors in her own drug trafficking
case. Not much unlike working Paul for years.
Jezebel
cried crocodile tears to gain sympathy from unsuspecting jurors and
when the prosecutor asked her why she was cooperating with the
government against Paul Bergrin, “Through tears, she said,
“I want it to end, the lies. ... I just wanted to end the lies, the
lifestyle I was living in.””
[No problem dear. That
lifestyle, care of Paul Bergrin, is over forever. Get used to your
new digs in club fed, cause you're going to be there for years to
come.]
Source: Jason Grant – The Star
Ledger
Jezebel had the
audacity to look at Paul with a half smile, sit down on the witness
stand, and pour herself a glass of water. She testified that as a 17
year-old she went to Paul's office under false pretenses and flirted
with him to get his attention. She played games with frequent phone
calls and drop-in visits for years and when she was 25 years old, the
relationship turned romantic [i.e. Paul eventually fell for
her trap]. A short time later (2002), she became “partners” in
the restaurant with Paul.
Ms.
Jauregui testified concerning the alleged conversation Paul had with
Curry and Claudio in the restaurant back in 2003, admitting that she
couldn't hear a word. On cross-examination, Paul pointed out the
various inconsistencies between her testimony and her statements to
the FBI, and she responded, “They probably misunderstood me
wrong, you know?”
“She acknowledged she had an intimate
relationship with Alejandro Barraza-Castro, who also pled guilty to
drug trafficking in this case, while she was living with Bergrin.
Jauregui faces 20 years to life in prison on her charges.”
Source: MaryAnn Spoto – The Star
Ledger
[So long, farewell,
auf wiedersehen, goodbye...]
Tuesday and
Wednesday would reveal an array of testimony, from a crime scene
investigator that changed his report years later to a jailhouse
snitch to a career criminal and Kemo's stepfather, Johnnie Davis.
Kemo Deshawn
McCray's stepfather, Johnnie Davis, testified and was able to
misdirect his anger at Paul Bergrin, though in reality we all know
the family blames the FBI for his murder on a Newark street.
“In the year before his murder,
McCray had worn a wire for the FBI as he made six crack cocaine
purchases from a dealer named William Baskerville.”
Davis had identified someone with
dreadlocks as the shooter of his stepson, but prosecutors would be
calling a bald Anthony Young to the stand next. Young “confessed,”
was convicted in the murder, and would testify to further reduce his
30 year prison sentence.
Source: Peter J. Sampson – The
Record
[What happened to
Kemo is sad and I feel for his family. Apparently the feds were able
to push buttons with Johnnie Davis and misdirect his anger at Paul.
The bottom line is that Kemo played in a heavy game, helping the feds
set-up major drug traffickers, and they did not protect him. He
should have been in WitSec.]
Richard
Hosten, another convicted drug dealer seeking favor with prosecutors,
testified that major drug trafficker Baskerville discussed his case
with him in lock-up. Since few people in such positions are that
stupid, or they wouldn't have such a position, and Hosten is another
convict looking for a better sentence, I will leave this one. Enough
is enough guys, really...
A
former client of Bergrin's, Albert Castro, claimed that Paul offered
him $10K to kill Kemo and even added that Paul tried to sleep with
his 5 ft. 350lb. 21 year-old daughter. Oh well – at least he cut
his deal to save his daughter from drug trafficking charges when
kilos of coke were seized from her home, though they were probably his kilos.
“Bergrin initially represented Castro
after he was arrested in 2008 by the Essex County Prosecutor’s
Office on charges of drug trafficking, attempted murder of a police
officer, gun possession and planning to rob a restaurant.”
[Alrighty then. One more lying loser.
Good grief!]
Source: Peter J.
Sampson – The Record
The articles
concerning the evolving testimony of a forensic pathologist seem to
be missing in action. I recall reading the testimony though, and it
changed substantially from his original report.
The next on the
stand to testilie would be “confessed” shooter Anthony Young.
According to Young, Paul plainly spelled out the directive to kill
Kemo to five different people, contradicting earlier testimony by
prosecution witnesses. Young actually claimed that Bergrin stated
this directive on a Newark street corner to five major drug dealers
According
to Young, alleged drug organization leader Hakeem Curry offered $15K
to the first one to find and kill Kemo. “Young said he
wanted the cash because, although he had $50,000 to $60,000 stashed
at his house, he wanted extra funds to finance an upcoming trip to
Los Angeles for the NBA All-Star Game.”
[I thought Kemo was killed in early
March. The game referenced by Young was on February 15, 2004 –
thank you MotoGP in the article Comments section. This is a major
conflict with the testimony, but no more so than imagining Bergrin
standing on a street corner in Newark with five major drug dealers,
directing them to kill Kemo.]
Source: MaryAnn Spoto – The Star
Ledger
[MaryAnn – Excellent coverage of the
trial! One thing though, concerning the title of this article: You
are referring to testimony damaging to the government, right?]
Before Paul Bergrin would get the
chance to cross-examine Young, the jury would be removed from the
courtroom twice by US District Judge William Martini. The judge is
already tired of the government procession of lying convicted felons
brought from prison to testify against Paul Bergrin.
[So are we Judge Martini, so are we.]
Source: MaryAnn Spoto – The Star
Ledger
Finally we reach the end of the week
and the cross-examination of Anthony Young. It's clear that Young was
coached by prosecutors, and probably coached for a week. When a
“witness” tries to memorize false testimony, well, it's bound to
be mixed-up. It was indeed confusing and Paul hammered away at each
and every discrepancy. Young denied being coached, though his
testimony had changed substantially to fit securely into the
prosecutor's description of events. This guy is so used to lying on
the stand that he's almost got it down to a science; however, he was
no match for Paul.
Source: MaryAnn Spoto – The Star
Ledger
[I truly would not be surprised if
Judge Martini tossed this abhorrent parade of convicts seeking
leniency and obviously malicious prosecution next week.]
There is a recess until Wednesday,
November 2, 2011.
POINTS
Paul Bergrin –
11 (accrued – 15)
US District Judge
William Martini – 5
feds – 1
(accrued – 1)
2 comments:
Actually, MaryAnn Spoto is NOT doing a very good job of covering the trial. There is so much that they DO NOT report, and I'm not talking about how they can't report everything due to space limitations. They deliberately omit KEY information. For example, I understand that Alberto Gonzalez really lost his temper on the stand. He wanted Paul to set his daughter up to take the fall for the drugs because he felt she would get a light sentence. On the other hand, they would throw the book at him. Paul refused to do it. When Paul questioned him about that he started yelling -- "that's right, you could have done that for me!" That was a major blow for the prosecution. Also, Yolanda's brother, Ramon testified how his attorney was working with the US Attorney and interrogated him for over 30 minutes trying to get information from Paul about him. MaryAnne Spoto was there for all of this and yet DID NOT REPORT ON IT. There are other things as well. I will be writing more about this.
@Makemba
Well, trust me - MaryAnn's reporting beats anything we have around here... Newspapers (editors) often favor prosecutors and agents in their reporting. It's a rare occasion when they come out swinging for the defense, no matter the evidence.
It would be great to have a blogger reporting on it from the courtroom. Consider starting a free blog with Google Blogspot - I'd sure link it on this blog.
I figure it already looks bad for the prosecution even if we're only reading half the blows.
Thank you for the real update!
Post a Comment